The reviews are coming in.


The reviews are coming in. Church-nerds are complaining Noah doesn't adhere enough to the original's established canon.

Delicious.

I heard it has stone giants. I want to see it now.

Comments

  1. Not stone giants, storm giants, and I've heard they take up way too much screen time for such a minor part of the book. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pft. That book has so many sequels there is no cannon any more. Heck, in the second book in the series there are four near-identical chapters told from slightly different viewpoints and then they... gah.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Come on, ASH LAW; it's post-modern meta-narrative exploring intertextualities. Get with the program.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As a religious historian (though a non-christian), my real issue with it is that by all accounts it seems like it isn't just vaguely non-canonical, but actively and very intentionally anti-canonical.  It seems like it was almost designed to insultingly twist around the story in the most anti-orthodox way possible.

    To put it in terms of what we're talking about here, this isn't just un-canonical, this is like a Superman story where Superman goes on a killing spree for no good reason, lex luthor is a bumbling idiot, and Pa Kent was a child abuser.  Its like a comic written by a guy who despises comics in order to intentionally make a point about how stupid comics are, all the while claiming that this is totally true to the spirit of the legend.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This is my gaming circle minus my ACKS players.