In 5e there doesn't seem to be any reason you couldn't ditch skills, and just offer advantage or proficiency bonus...

In 5e there doesn't seem to be any reason you couldn't ditch skills, and just offer advantage or proficiency bonus on rolls relating to background, class, and possibly race.

Comments

  1. You're totally right. 

    Or reserve Advantage for situational stuff, and use the proficiency add for anything that fits your character's idiom.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yep. There are a lot of things you could ditch in 5E that haven't been for legacy reasons. Like ability scores, which haven't meant much since 2E.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like ability scores in 5th, because they make hand DC's for making checks against.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Editted to add proficiency bonus.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I was looking for a simple character sheet last night since I'm running a 5e one-shot for a group including newbs. That made me think of what I could ditch.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think it would be a bit tougher when it comes to some of the Bard stuff who gets stuff like proficiency bonuses to non-skills at half or whatever but yeah probably.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Good point. Probably better idea if you're just using Basic, which I will be for this one-shot.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Doesn't the DMG have this as a option? Add Prof. ability checks. Each class has two ability its prof in

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nathan Panke  save profs, isn't it?

    ReplyDelete
  10. No, ability checks Benjamin Baugh
    Pg. 263 of the DMG

    ReplyDelete
  11. Nathan Panke
     no, I meant prof on the same ability checks as you have save proficiency for.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Honestly, the only thing I flipped to in the DMG was the "make a monster" page.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This is my gaming circle minus my ACKS players.