I have a new favorite dinosaur controversy.


I have a new favorite dinosaur controversy. There is a claim that the Broome Sandstone in Australia shows sauropod footprints of a titanosaur that are 2 meters wide. Meaning you could lay down in the footprint easily. This is a picture someone on a forum posted (causing excellent "someone is wrong on the internet" arguments) showing how big an animal with that size prints would be. The little sauropod is an Argentinosaurus. Meaning the big guy there dwarfs a blue whale in size.

There are all kinds of reasons this might not be true (no fossils in Australia (or anywhere else) near that size, for one), but it's fun to think about.

Comments

  1. Geezus Jones! I wish I had the math to calculate how much it'd have to eat.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tore Nielsen My calculations yield the conclusion "ALL THE THINGS."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Also, the tracks are real. The Broome Sandstone actually erodes into towers of pancake shaped prints stacked on top of each other. There was that much sauropod traffic. The question is if the prints have deformed or not.

    ReplyDelete
  4. More terrifying indeed is contemplation of the volume of excrement. A trade route could be built along its back trail, it is a mythic beast that clears farmlands and then leaves fertilizer in a central location in a line where there's civilization a day's travel apart.

    You are looking at the God of Trade Routes.

    ReplyDelete
  5. The hypothetical creature is known as a "Gigantopod" which is just excellent.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Andrew Shields I like this idea!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wait, isn't that just "Dinosaur Bigfoot"?!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Well, Australia is big. Who are we to say that there couldn't be a blue whale-sized dino out there?

    #TeachTheCryptoversy

    ReplyDelete
  9. A sauropod longer than a blue whale isn't in doubt. Massing more than 210 tons though...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This is my gaming circle minus my ACKS players.