This is an interesting theory, but I notice the author has to omit one of the most important Heinlein novels to make...
Originally shared by Curt Thompson This is an interesting theory, but I notice the author has to omit one of the most important Heinlein novels to make it work. Time Enough For Love was written in the very early 70s and was a straight (heh) extrapolation of the chaotic and frenetic zeitgeist of that era. http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2012/11/the-joke-is-on-us-the-two-careers-of-robert-a-heinlein/
I disagree, but since disagreeing with Patrick or his ilk makes me a troll, I'll just sit on my hands.
ReplyDeleteJames Olchak
ReplyDeleteClearly that's not true. You would have needed your hands to write that baiting comment.
And it's not your disagreement that makes you a troll. It's that you feel the need to publicly declare both your disagreement, and your unwillingness to express disagreement for fear of internet name calling. Trolls actively seek conflict, and that's exactly what you're doing.
And I've had a shitty morning, so I'm rising to your bait.
EDIT: lol blocked. Cool beans.
Indeed. Hopefully they'll learn from this (both in this world and the movie's world).
ReplyDeleteThanks Beloch, I knew there were some of you out there unblocked.
ReplyDeleteDaniel Swensen it was too cynical even for me. ”Lol, focus grouping is BS but we did it anyway so enjoy your super dinosaur, plebes.” But the old T Rex wins, so what does that mean? Nothing, probably, because the satire doesn't go very deep.
ReplyDeleteYogurt said it best when he said, ”Merchandising, Merchandising, Merchandising!”
But I enjoyed all the scenes of mayhem, and was fairly entertained for my $7.50.
Beloch Shrike Blocked that dude a while back. Same sort of reasons.
ReplyDeleteMichael R
ReplyDeleteI don't block anybody, he blocked me. Which, I suppose, has become something of an OSR right of passage.
"Do you ignore flame bait, or has James Olchak blocked you?"