Inaccurate paleoart as monsters.
Inaccurate paleoart as monsters. These demonic and wildly wrong quetzalcoatlus could be a good illustration of wyverns, dragons, or vrocks.
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/quetzalcoatlus-the-evil-pin-headed-toothy-nightmare-monster-that-wants-to-eat-your-soul/
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/quetzalcoatlus-the-evil-pin-headed-toothy-nightmare-monster-that-wants-to-eat-your-soul/
Dougal Dixon books were... odd.
ReplyDeleteIn a good way, I think. But these...Jeez. 😨
ReplyDeleteCasey G. I mostly remember him being absolutely fanatical about Tyrannosaurus being a fatassed lumbering scavenger, whose teeth would pop out of its skull if it tried biting anything that wasn't already rotten.
ReplyDeleteThat one even made it into his The New Dinosaurs, where tyrannosaurs eventually evolve into two-legged fatassed lumbering scavengers called "gourmands."
ReplyDeleteOne more thing: These weird Gorgosaurus (by Heilmann) would make pretty good monsters: lindahall.org
ReplyDeleteYou could make an entire monster manual from out-of-date or off-the-mark dinosaur illos!
ReplyDeleteJay Exonauts The further back you go, the weirder they usually get.
ReplyDeleteI've read After Man and Man After Man, but not New Dinosaurs. Talk about alternative Monster Manuals...
ReplyDeleteCasey G. The New Dinosaurs was already super wrong-headed when it came out in the 90s. I remember getting it for Christmas and thinking it was really weird how Dixon gave all the dinosaurs fur. Because the idea of them having feathers was obviously nonsense.
ReplyDeleteStill, some cool-looking monsters in there, for sure.
I'm pretty sure Caucasian Jesus rides this demonic quetzalcoatlus into battle.
ReplyDeletesivatherium.narod.ru - Dougal Dixon "The New Dinosaurs"
ReplyDeleteAh ha. All of The New Dinosaurs.