This is the article I was waiting for.

This is the article I was waiting for. An analysis of the new dinosaur taxonomy. Complete with the question I've been asking for a while: "where the fuck did feathers actually start?" And does this new theory help answer that?
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/tetrapod-zoology/ornithoscelida-rises-a-new-family-tree-for-dinosaurs/

Comments

  1. GOD DAMMIT I KNEW IT

    I feel like Gregory S. Paul mentioned something about this back in 1988, particularly the herrerasaur/sauropodomorph similarities.

    Didn't Bakker make a big point about heterodontosaurs having a lot of saurischian characteristics in The Dinosaur Heresies way back when?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ever since they started finding feathers all over the place I've felt something was screwy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Naish even mentions that Bakker and Paul had argued for something like this but couldn't back it up at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My Dinosaur Heresies is in the garage or I'd check.

    ReplyDelete
  5. People are still acting like this is revelatory:
    simon-roy.tumblr.com - REALM OF THE BLOODLORDS, cmkosemensketchbook: Digital composite, hand-made...

    I read about a heterodontosaur-like animal being basal to all dinosaurs (and pterosaurs) in the 80s! I didn't dream it up! I bought the book at the Cleveland Lloyd allosaur dig gift shop when I was 11! Everybody forgot about it?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This is my gaming circle minus my ACKS players.