Hmmm, for a recent generator I actually created a range with the proper expected values (one 3, three 4s, five 5s, etc) and then did an INDEX((3D6_Roll, randbetween(1,ROWS(3d6_Roll)),1)) - I haven't tested it for the curve it produces yet. I wonder if the results will be any different.
Originally shared by Curt Thompson This is an interesting theory, but I notice the author has to omit one of the most important Heinlein novels to make it work. Time Enough For Love was written in the very early 70s and was a straight (heh) extrapolation of the chaotic and frenetic zeitgeist of that era. http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2012/11/the-joke-is-on-us-the-two-careers-of-robert-a-heinlein/
Originally shared by Kirill Grouchnikov #pixelpushing When I start wiring real data to the UI pieces that have up until now were tested with fake content, and after it compiles I run it on the device, and it crashes immediately because, you know, real data , and I'm all like...
Originally shared by Andrew “Incomitatum” Chason Hit Me with your Horror I am looking for some horror flicks. The newer the better. Good is good too. I liked House of 1000 Corpses and Devil's Rejects . I liked both the new Texas Chainsaw movies. Hills Have Eyes 1 was good (never saw the second . Jeepers Creepers 1 & 2 come to mind as well. A little camp, and/or "back woods" can't hurt. Any of you have any recommendations? Lets try and not go too far back than mid 90's. Aside: How was the new "Freddy" movie? Suggested So Far • Bones (2001) • Drag Me to Hell (2009) • The Grudge (2004) • Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2010) • Dog Soldiers (2002) • The Decent (2005) • Creature (2011) • The Last Winter (2006)
looks like a middle finger
ReplyDeleteFuck you, you don't get any 16s, 17s, or 18s.
ReplyDeleteThe dice said, "Suck on my big 10." Lol
ReplyDelete#trueosr
ReplyDeleteNow roll them 36 more times and compare the charts.
ReplyDeleteHere's 72 rolls.https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/09cx7AggCSgbMt3xTX4sX3ePsHX7M1nDHSPqJ0YcQVMj18qOna2_UTEzqnFZ7mOLnWEGD_J5sDE
ReplyDeleteNot a single 17 or 18? You gots the bad luck, mang!
ReplyDeleteYou should have done these in red ink. Now it'd look like it's bleeding down the page.
ReplyDelete(What is wrong with me?)
I know it's not a big sample number, but that's a pretty uneven curve.
ReplyDeleteanydice.com - AnyDice
ReplyDeleteJoseph Teller but Anydice will show the expected curve, but a ‘runtime’ curve.
ReplyDeleteA runtime curve is something like this... app.roll20.net - QuantumRoll Status | Roll20: Online virtual tabletop
Casey G. Please have excel run that shit another 900k please.
I'll get right on that.
ReplyDeleteHmmm, for a recent generator I actually created a range with the proper expected values (one 3, three 4s, five 5s, etc) and then did an INDEX((3D6_Roll, randbetween(1,ROWS(3d6_Roll)),1)) - I haven't tested it for the curve it produces yet. I wonder if the results will be any different.
ReplyDeleteYou had Excel roll the dice but you made the graph on paper?
ReplyDeleteIt kept recalculating when I typed another number, even in a different sheet! I'm not an Excel guru.
ReplyDeleteNat aS I had the exact same thought.
ReplyDeleteNew way to stay entertained at work. I hadn't used the randbetween function before. Thanks.
ReplyDeletehttps://plus.google.com/photos/...
you rolled 2 18's for your new character huh? yup sure did.
ReplyDeleteMax Vanderheyden show off.
ReplyDeleteMax Venderheyden's Excel is better than Casey's.
ReplyDelete