So bored at work I had Excel roll 3d6 36 times and graphed the results to see what kind of curve I'd get.


So bored at work I had Excel roll 3d6 36 times and graphed the results to see what kind of curve I'd get.

Comments

  1. Fuck you, you don't get any 16s, 17s, or 18s.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Now roll them 36 more times and compare the charts.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Not a single 17 or 18? You gots the bad luck, mang!

    ReplyDelete
  4. You should have done these in red ink. Now it'd look like it's bleeding down the page.

    (What is wrong with me?)

    ReplyDelete
  5. I know it's not a big sample number, but that's a pretty uneven curve.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Joseph Teller but Anydice will show the expected curve, but a ‘runtime’ curve.

    A runtime curve is something like this... app.roll20.net - QuantumRoll Status | Roll20: Online virtual tabletop

    Casey G. Please have excel run that shit another 900k please.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hmmm, for a recent generator I actually created a range with the proper expected values (one 3, three 4s, five 5s, etc) and then did an INDEX((3D6_Roll, randbetween(1,ROWS(3d6_Roll)),1)) - I haven't tested it for the curve it produces yet. I wonder if the results will be any different.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You had Excel roll the dice but you made the graph on paper?

    ReplyDelete
  9. It kept recalculating when I typed another number, even in a different sheet! I'm not an Excel guru.

    ReplyDelete
  10. New way to stay entertained at work. I hadn't used the randbetween function before. Thanks.
    https://plus.google.com/photos/...

    ReplyDelete
  11. you rolled 2 18's for your new character huh? yup sure did.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Max Venderheyden's Excel is better than Casey's.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tonight, my "Lethal Damage" 13th Age campaign draws to a close.