All I want to do is scan with a Canon all-in-one, Ubuntu.

All I want to do is scan with a Canon all-in-one, Ubuntu. Why should I need to be a fucking programmer to do this? Printing was easy-peasy. Scanning...ARGHLEBARGLE.

Comments

  1. Larry LadeMarch 24, 2014 at 7:01 PM

    You might have to find a backport of the bleeding-edge driver version to get SANE to work with newer stuff.
    Try (link to some old stuff)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Brian TakleMarch 24, 2014 at 8:22 PM

    It depends a lot on the device make. I have an HP all-in-one and it worked out of the box. (Note: HP is really Linux-friendly.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Casey G.March 24, 2014 at 8:34 PM

    I replaced an HP that scanned fine...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Keith HoovestolMarch 25, 2014 at 1:04 PM

    is it wireless printer?  some printers only scan when using usb printer cable.  seriously that is a thing with my printer and it pissed me off.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Casey G.March 25, 2014 at 1:05 PM

    No, it's a Linux thing. I might be forced to boot into Windows to scan.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Larry LadeMarch 26, 2014 at 8:11 PM

    What model of printer do you have? What version of Ubuntu are you running?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Casey G.March 26, 2014 at 8:20 PM

    It's a Canon ImageClass MF4880dw. Ubuntu 12.04.

    I found a bunch of stuff about enabling the backend for Xsane, but my model wasn't listed in the file I tried to edit. And I basically know nothing about terminal commands when I can't just cut and paste.

    I appreciate it, Larry Lade but don't knock yourself out!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Larry LadeMarch 26, 2014 at 9:04 PM

    Ah, that's pretty new. Support for that appeared in pixma driver 0.17.6 as "i-SENSYS MF4800 Series". There's a report of someone getting it to work right six weeks ago.

    Rather than figure out how to pull the latest version from git, you should give this repo a shot:
    https://launchpad.net/~rolfbensch/+archive/sane-git
    That will have the very latest (possibly buggy) SANE.

    The "good news" is you could just wait a year or so, and it will probably work just fine out of the box.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Casey G.March 26, 2014 at 9:05 PM

    I will give it a shot. Thanks.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This is an interesting theory, but I notice the author has to omit one of the most important Heinlein novels to make...

Originally shared by Curt Thompson This is an interesting theory, but I notice the author has to omit one of the most important Heinlein novels to make it work. Time Enough For Love was written in the very early 70s and was a straight (heh) extrapolation of the chaotic and frenetic zeitgeist of that era. http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2012/11/the-joke-is-on-us-the-two-careers-of-robert-a-heinlein/
Read more

#pixelpushing

Image
Originally shared by Kirill Grouchnikov #pixelpushing When I start wiring real data to the UI pieces that have up until now were tested with fake content, and after it compiles I run it on the device, and it crashes immediately because, you know, real data , and I'm all like...
Read more

Hit Me with your Horror

Originally shared by Andrew “Incomitatum” Chason Hit Me with your Horror I am looking for some horror flicks. The newer the better. Good is good too. I liked House of 1000 Corpses and Devil's Rejects . I liked both the new Texas Chainsaw movies. Hills Have Eyes 1 was good (never saw the second . Jeepers Creepers 1 & 2 come to mind as well. A little camp, and/or "back woods" can't hurt. Any of you have any recommendations? Lets try and not go too far back than mid 90's. Aside: How was the new "Freddy" movie? Suggested So Far • Bones (2001) • Drag Me to Hell (2009) • The Grudge (2004) • Don't Be Afraid of the Dark (2010) • Dog Soldiers (2002) • The Decent (2005) • Creature (2011) • The Last Winter (2006)
Read more